17 Jan 2014 09:14:04
site now says we will let laceless go if anyone meets our 3m price tag and loan him back to us for the rest of season I really hope that's not true 3m seems very cheap


1.) 17 Jan 2014
Turned 5 million down last season so were going to let him go for 3 million yeah rite


2.) 17 Jan 2014
Why go somewhere else to sit on the bench?
He's just made our first team and his value will only increase.
Billy is sorting out the spine with Hobbs and Vaghan and will keep Darlow and Lascelles.


3.) 17 Jan 2014
Could be the fact that they might double or treble his wages? I hope its not true but not many people could refuse an offer like that.


4.) 17 Jan 2014
Not a chance. We turned down an offer before he was a regular in the side. 6,000,000 plus add ons and that would temp Fawaz, especially as we've got Wilson fit soon


5.) 17 Jan 2014
If they let him go for that ill be gutted - way too low and shows no ambition to keep our best players.


6.) 17 Jan 2014
Short sighted in the extreme. Firstly massively undervalued. £15m is more like it
Secondly, we have him loaned back, get promoted. then what do we do for a centre half of Premiere quality?
A few brain cells missing somewhere


7.) 17 Jan 2014
If a player of such quality and potential is allowed to leave for such a paltry sum questions have to be asked for the first time about the clubs ambitions and I mean both the manager and owner.


8.) 17 Jan 2014
Let's not forget that he is barely proven at this level let alone the Premier League. £15 million is a little punchy for a punt


9.) 17 Jan 2014
There seems no point cashing in on lascelles at the moment he still has a long way to go but seems to improving with every game, at least if he stays with us and we do go up he will have a chance to prove himself in prem where as if he goes to a prem club he would prob be loaned out to one of our rivals in champ untill end of season just like bamford. What concerns me at the moment though is the lack of concreate striking options coming in the Silence is deafening!

{Ed034's Note - the silence is no different to most football clubs


10.) 17 Jan 2014
If Southampton want £30m for luke shaw, Jamaal has to be worth more than £3m in comparison.


11.) 17 Jan 2014
If we decide to sell any of Lascelles, Lansbury or Darlow we are showing absolutely no ambition whatsoever. They are the spine of our future. I know every player has his price but £3m is not it.


12.) 17 Jan 2014
£15m?? don't talk wet. he has played the best part of 20 games in his career. Awesome prospect, but still unproven and has never played PL football. I would say £3m was reasonable


13.) 17 Jan 2014
Ridiculously low fee - If we go up we'll have to spend more than that on a replacement


14.) 17 Jan 2014
Site says? what site? not ours and for what my opinion is worth I agree with most folk on here if he was worth enough to attract a bid 2 years ago of 5M why in the world should we consider a lower one now? it makes no sense.

Kev

{Ed034's Note - a website of which I cannot add


15.) 17 Jan 2014
It's unbelievable how ridiculously high fans rate their own players at. £15m? don't talk soft. Lascelles is still very raw and massively unproven. I keep hearing Forest fans rating Darlow at £10m too! Have they got their heads screwed on right! £10m would make him the 5th most expensive GK in the World, ever. Ludicrous.

I'm a (realistic) Forest fan and think we'd do well to get near £5m each for them. Hopefully with a loan back deal included.

Have a word, Forest fans.


16.) 17 Jan 2014
The only site that matters is NFFC, we have been rumoured with numerous players that never come, we may well sell a player to fund others coming in, it's no good saying get rid of the dead wood, they command very little, if any fee, I would assume the club as a business plan, that with the dreaded ffp may well dictate matters whatever happens I sure the chairman and manager have the best intentions of the club at heart. with domestic player rules on the horizon the value of our young players as increased, so maybe 3m for Jamal is way to low it is imo

{Ed034's Note - how rude....I think it goes this site, forest and then the rest


17.) 17 Jan 2014
What sites this on?. is there any proof of who may have said this latest yarn. this site ain't called nffc rumors for nowt is it. that's all this rubbish is a rumor.

{Ed034's Note - as I said earlier, the op did put the sites names, but I did not add it


18.) 17 Jan 2014
It is mad to think if Wilson never got inj he prob wouldn't be even in the team now were talking about him leaving. Question is there nobody in the youth system that could come in as a striker safe money and hassle. Tomo Irish red


19.) 17 Jan 2014
Just because some PL club bids £3m doesn't mean we have to sell.

They're both our players and we can value them what we like.

That said, the market value of both and the prospect of them being future internationals, I would rate them at;

Lascelles 7.5m
Darlow 5m

AJH


20.) 17 Jan 2014
Just wondered why no one has asked the op which forest player has boots without laces and is still worth 3m?


21.) 17 Jan 2014
I was about to but thought it may be predictive text


22.) 17 Jan 2014
Yes it was and I only saw it once it had been posted bloody predictive text lol


23.) 17 Jan 2014
£3m for velcro boots. Seems bit steep.