Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Nottingham Forest Rumours Member Posts
Leigh's Profile
Leigh's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Leigh's Posts
To Leigh's last 5 banter posts
To Leigh's last 5 rumour replies
Leigh's banter posts with other poster's replies to Leigh's banter posts
05 Feb 2015 16:30:49
I think just about cope with the odd win here and there, in the vague hope we would get Cohen and Reid back playing to get the side back playing the type of football we want. Yes I could understand the sacking of Pearce, no manager is above the law (even Stuart) and not getting results meant it was time for him to go. But, once again what is going on off the field?, our reputation tarnished by not paying our debts, no communication by the man at the top leading to resignations and backroom staff coming and going through an endless revolving door.
WHEN DOES ALL THIS STOP, i just want my club back that I've supported for the last 30 years, this is just MADNESS.
Good luck to Dougie.
1.) I have supported Forest for 59 years and want the same. Just to get the club's respect back and for the club to be run properly in all areas.
Sorry Ed, you'll see I pressed the button on this post not Knowing about Antonio and Assombalonga, this is of course great news.
06 Aug 2014 17:55:25
Hi Ed,
Here we go again it seems, and the season not yet started! 2 weeks ago the team seemed to be shaping up nicely, with a good all round balance in the squad. An encouraging mention of even academy players seeming going well in pre-season, all great, and yes I agreed with stuart on radio Nottingham, the only concern was to strengthen a little more up front.
Fast forward only a matter of a week. Perhaps I need to understand more about the fair play thing, squad numbers and general financing but why oh why let the strongest players go again when seemingly stuart had a great platform with virtually everything in place for us to mount a great challenge, yes more fire power was needed but now if the likes of cox, mackie, landsbury, hendo and otheres go that puts us back at square one up front does it not.
I can now totally see the point of the 2 going to Newcastle, but were we not meant to be building?
{Ed034's Note - other than Lansbury, the other three Pearce wanted gone, so he could bring in his own.
They are gone so we can then build.
The only one that Pearce doesn't want gone of the four mentionmis Lansbury and that decision is Lansburys.
06 Aug 2014 17:55:25
Hi Ed,
Here we go again it seems, and the season not yet started! 2 weeks ago the team seemed to be shaping up nicely, with a good all round balance in the squad. An encouraging mention of even academy players seeming going well in pre-season, all great, and yes I agreed with stuart on radio Nottingham, the only concern was to strengthen a little more up front.
Fast forward only a matter of a week. Perhaps I need to understand more about the fair play thing, squad numbers and general financing but why oh why let the strongest players go again when seemingly stuart had a great platform with virtually everything in place for us to mount a great challenge, yes more fire power was needed but now if the likes of cox, mackie, landsbury, hendo and otheres go that puts us back at square one up front does it not.
I can now totally see the point of the 2 going to Newcastle, but were we not meant to be building?
{Ed034's Note - are we not building by keeping the two lads on loan for a season and then signing Antonio and assombalonga??