Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Nottingham Forest Rumours Member Posts
RLB84's Profile
RLB84's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To RLB84's Posts
To RLB84's last 5 rumour replies
It irks me that Pearce suggested we were not a selling club and this is exactly what we are doing.
He's going to have to spend nearly 7 million to replace one of these future stars 'should' we get in the premier league. It doesn't make sense to me and leaves me with a hollow feeling in my gut.
More money required and do we need to sell to compete? Can we not acquire 1 or 2 astute loans and keep our best players, at least for a few more seasons!?
{Ed034's Note - he has always said if an offer comes in which he thinks is a accepetable and that he can then use this money straight away to imprive the squad, he would do it
I've not seen any sponser on the shirt? The ground hasn't changed it's name.
We should aim to be tight with whatever money we do have. This league has a lot of games, we need a strong spine to the squad (which we've got). Burnley went up last year, Derby nearly did - both spent very little in comparison to us.
I agree that we do need 3 maybe 4 more but don't think this requires millions being spent. Ed mentioned some very good loan players: young, hungry to prove themselves in their profession. That's the way to go.
If we get in the prem, then we spend millions on 4 or 5 real quality players.
He's 33 - rather have buck toothed Ronaldinho if were signing aged Brazilian stars of the past
I still think we need more width
The airline is essentially owned by the State. If there is any truth in this deal then what has happened at City would be happening with Forest.
It sounds too good to be true.