06 Oct 2017 09:20:28
Jokic and Pinillos or Fox and Troare?


1.) 06 Oct 2017
06 Oct 2017 11:03:31
You serious mate???


2.) 06 Oct 2017
06 Oct 2017 13:35:17
Look what we could of had as LB options.


3.) 06 Oct 2017
06 Oct 2017 14:24:19
Bertrand!


4.) 06 Oct 2017
06 Oct 2017 15:14:36
Pinillos & Jokic were both decent stay at home left backs.

Fox is a decent LB who doubles up as potentially our best CB & Traore is a decent attacking LB who can Play CB in a 3.

Then consider Pinillos is a crock, so i'd rather keep Traore & Fox, assuming that was the question.


5.) 06 Oct 2017
06 Oct 2017 16:24:46
Pearce, but we should move on.

Traore is a class player. Imho


6.) 06 Oct 2017
06 Oct 2017 17:37:48
Fox??? Better off with "Samantha" Fox!!👙👙👙😂😂😂


7.) 06 Oct 2017
06 Oct 2017 20:20:35
Regardless of formation, a fullback or wingbacks priority is to defend or you may as well play out and out wingers. Defensively in that position i wouldn't pay Traore or Fox and even Darikwa for that matter in rusty washers. Fox is excluded from that when playing as a centre back.
If i had a pound for everytime i'd seen an opposition runner ghost past Darikwa and Traore like they wern't even there this season i'd have at least a tenner by now.


8.) 06 Oct 2017
06 Oct 2017 20:23:44
Traore is starting to show us how good he can be,staying fits been his problem,so far so good on that one.
Not a fan of fox especially at left back,but to be fair thought he got some timely tackles in against Sheffield United,and his distribution is better than any other centre back we have.


9.) 06 Oct 2017
06 Oct 2017 20:52:11
Well Fred,walker can't defend,but city paid 50 million,and that was second choice over Dani alves,
Modern trend mate,very few can defend.


10.) 06 Oct 2017
06 Oct 2017 21:00:40
This is getting scary. We are on the same page!